Skip to main content

Full text of "fort monroe"

See other formats


ic Overview of the Threat Construct 


Blue 

Paradig 


m 


Blue 

Target 

Profile 


Heavy Forces 
Rapid Reinforcement 
Propositioned Stocks 
Strong Alliance 
Nuclear Deterrence 

Fixed Targets 
Massed-Formati 
Logistical Sites 
Centralized C2 
Terrestrial Comm 



Entry Operations 
Buildup of Capability 
Air/Missile Campaign 
Ground/Air Campaign 
Transition 
Operations 


Air and Sea PODs 
Forward Bases 
LOC's & Log 
Stockpiles 
Long haul C2 
Technical ISR 


Alliance and 
Coalitions Homelai 
Public Support 
Will to fight 


Cold War 

1980 
Forward Deployed 



Red 

Strate 

gy 


Red 

Capabilit 

y 


77 ? 

V> J 



Expand Alliance 
Arms Race 

Overwhelm Defenses 
Nuclea’r Deterrence 
ADA Supports 
Maneuver 

Strategic Strike 
Global Ai’i 9 & Navy 
Echeloned Ground Forces 
etc. .... 



Forward Presence 
:er US & NATO 


n m 


r 


Local/Regional Dominance 
Deny Extra Regional Access 
Force Preservation/ Regime 
Survival 

Undermine Alliances & 
Coalitions 


J 


nun 

Leverage Technology 
£onvenfional & Unconventional 


Forces 

TBM's, Cruise Missiles 
Air & Missile Defenses 
Information Operations 
Denial & Deception 







OLD PARADIGM 


Defensive Counterattack 


Offensive 


xxx 


Rear Area Security 



Roles 

•Deep Operations 
•Close Air Support 
•Lift/Air Assault 
•C2 

Conditions 

•Linear Battlefield 
•Rear Areas (Sanctuary) 
•Massed Formations 
•Defensive ADA 
•Area Lethal SEAD possible 

Threats 

•Air/Missile Attacks to 
Airfields 

•SOF Attacks/WME 
•Artillery/Rocket Attack to 
FARP 

•IAD- Protecting Targets 
and 

Along Routes 

•EW- Jamming Corns, 

Radars 

and GPS 

•EMP 

•Conventional, Non-Air 
























NEW PARADIGM 


Offensive 


Defensive 



Recon Fires Complex 
Recon Strike Complex 
Military Systemology 


Roles 

•Deep Operations 
•Close Air Support 
•Lift/Air Assault 
•C2 

Conditions 

•Non-Linear Battlefield 
•No Rear Areas 
(No Sanctuary) 
•Offensive ADA 
•Dispersed Targets 
•Expanded ISR 
•Precision SEAD 
Required 

Threats 

•Air/Missile Attacks 
•WME 

•Direct Fires 
•SOF 

•Artillery/Rocket 

Attacks 

•Passive Sensors 
•EW- Jamming Corns, 
Radars and GPS 
•EMP 




Cell/GPS Comms 


- 


reat Air Defense 




UAV/ GPS jamming 


Multi-spectral Systems 


Missiles 

Deception -Ra<|io Net \ EarlyJA/arning 
AN PAD! 



Command 
Centi 

Fusion Center 


GPS Jamming 


Armed Reconnaissance Role 


Al 


iws Commander 
Unimpeded 
Rapid Movement 

hout Battle: 



/ \ 
/ \ 


uav/ GPS Jamming 


Threat Air Defense Ambus 


Early Warning 



Anti-Helicopter MinesDeception -Radio Net 



Gain Informatii 
Superiority 
and SA 
eny Enemy l 


/ \ 


UAV/ jGPSjafn iti i ng 


/ 


/ 




/ 


/ 


/ 






Early Warning 


MAN PADS 


— — 


L^frectton Findii 


Decoys 


Early Warning- HUMINT/SPF 


Deception -Radio Net 







le 


ximizes CClS, 
Minimal Time 
to React, 

ses IAD 


Deep Attack Role 



m 



UAV/ GPS Jamming 


Threat Air Defense System Protec 




Early Warning 



MAN PADS 



T 


Early Warning- HUMINT/S 



Anti-Helicopter MinesDeception -Radio Net 





General Air Defense Trends (U) 


WHY IT'S CHANGING 


igh 







Multi Function Missile Systdrm 

ADA/SAM MIX 

L 

Millimeter Wave Radars P 

Multi-spectral 
Sensors 

Improved Munitions 



TODAY 2000 201!> 


Applying Lessons L 
Adoptive and Ad 


* 


Emerging 



Today -Tomorrow 


Emerging S 


Multi-spectral sensor integr 
NOE/OTH Radar capability 
Integration of gun and missilBedundant C3I 
Advanced munitions 



Enhanced targeting 


Dispersed, Integrated, 
and Decentralized 
engagement 

Mixed automated and 
manual tracking-- win war 
of weather 

Maximum use of complex 
terrain 


EVOLUTION CHARACTERIZED BY CHANGE IN THE 

TARGET SET 


Non Traditional Air 
Defense Employment ... 
Air Defense Ambush 






AD Missile Trends 


• Dual Mode S&sker 

• SzjIv&s 

• Multi-missile Guidance 
Capability 

• Target Priority TBM, Cruise 
Missile and MmmK 

• Increased Range 



Strategies 

Mobility 
Target C2ISR 

Increase Bins Air Stand-off 
Ctmlse Missile Threat 




Tactical System Trends 


• Networked Systems 

• Airburst Munitions 

• Advanced Signet 
Processing 

improved dirtier 
Processing 
Target Recognition 

• Combination ADA/SAM 
Systems 

• Sensor is^tegmilen 
Radar/EO 



Passive Interce pt 
Point "forget Defense 
Air Defense Ambush 
Met Tied to Troops 


All Weather Targeting 


C: Wpns Trends 




AD Radar Trends 


• Millimeter Wmve 
Reduce Ground " Clutter " 
Hover detection 

• Phased Array 

•Low Probability Of 
Intercept 
Low peak power 
Frequency Modulated 
High Operating Frequency 

• Advanced Sign®! 
Processing 




ompllmentary System 
Redundant 
Sensor Fusion 





MAN PADS Trends 



• Improved Radar mnd 
Infrared Guidance 

•din pro wad Seekers 

• Increased range 

•All Aspect ongsjgofnonit 
Capability 



Mistral 


Source: U.S. Army 



K 


Stinger 


• Increased Countermeasure 
Czj pability 


Strategies 

Offensive 

Ambush 






UAV - Trends 


Attack UAV 


• TARGETS gg^ggEB 

• AIR DEFENSE RADARS 


• ARMOR 

• C2 

• PASSIVE SENSORS 

• IR 

• RF SEEKERS 

• ACOUSTIC 

• SMALL WARHEADS 

• HE - POSSIBLE CHEMICAL 



• FRAG 


- POSSIBLE BIOLOGICAL 


40 + countries developing/using U/ Vs 
Difficult to detect , track, and destr ly 
UAVs are proven force multipliers 


Strategies 
Reduce Air Force Requireme 
Near Real Time Intelligence 
Degrade Digitized Battlefield 
Preserve Force 



Electronic Warfare UAV 



Dedicated Com ms Jammer 







Aircraft Trends 



• ff9e#»s?s®«! US’S 

Of PGMs/Crulse Missiles 

• increased Stand-off 
Range 

• Reduced Radar Cross 
Section 

• Increased Aircraft 
Survivability 

• Increased Multi-role 
Variants 



Strategies 
Regional Dominance 
Potential Air Threat 
Survivability vs Attack 


AIRCRAFT CAN STILL REPRESENT A LETHAL THREAT. 




Helicopter Trends 


• Increased Stand-off 
Range 

• Improved Accuracy 

• Better Might & Adverse 
Weath er Capability 

• Improved Aircraft 
Survivability Systems 

• Improved IR Signature 
Reduction Technology 



Strategies 


Reconnaissance 
Limited Attack w/ Conditions 




[tack Helicopters Are A Dangerous Threat To T 

Maneuver Force 





Aviation Implications 


Aviation Operational Environment Highlights: 

■ a wider spectrum of operations, increased threat 
technological capability and unpredictability leading 
to a more complex and challenging range of operating 
environments . . 

"In association with an Adaptive and Adoptive Threat 

* A Challenge for Independent Maneuver 

* Suggests Combined Arms operations 

* Extremely lethal, offensively oriented air defense 
environment 

* Degradation of U.S. technological superiority 

* Changed target sets 

* Challenges US preferred method of 
Warfare.... Standoff, Precision